Some facts are not provable on this level as like the existence of God. This was one of the taunting constantly thrown at Jesus while living as a mortal.
You have been endowed with a mind and spiritual helpers to discern between "facts vs friction".
I am specifically asking the accuser. Let's hear from her.
On your answer, each "different belief system" is based on the search for God (Truth). From the barbarian to now the semi barbarian. The divine goal for this planet is to achieve light and life. But the brotherhood of man has to be achieved first.
Even these tech people in trying to create God is really searching for God (our Eternal Father).
Seems to me there's at least one exception - the belief system that insists there is no God. There is no search for God there. By the way, arguing a "divine goal" is illogical for a planet but it also implies knowledge based on belief not on fact unless I missed the Zoom call...
Think born nuclear of the planets nucleus. I was born the Trinity AntiMatter Singularity both in the flesh 3 states as one for everlasting life. No psychologyologies I'm eBe - ⚜️
The denial of God is actually the reverse. One cannot deny something if the thing does not exist in one's mind.
Actually, the creation of life/planet/universe is by divine design/goal. The progression of this planet from a hot mess to suitable for life was by divine design/goal. Fact - creation and evolution exist together. The physical is a direct expression of the divine. God is ever searching for ways to express himself. Creation always originates from God.
You wrote "denial" I wrote there are those who "insists there is no God". There's an important semantic difference. But I'll bow out now because of the futility of arguing for or against a belief system. Fair winds.
What's the difference between denial and "insists there is no God"?
A belief system grounded in faith. This is all we humans have right now as we journey inward in the search of the Creator. The life of Jesus as a human was also to demonstrate the belief in God based entirely on faith.
The difference is basically one of viewpoint. Denial, definitionally, means a refusal to admit the truth or reality of something. It implies that, in our discussion, God is real and some people refuse to accept that. Hence, they are deniers.
On the other hand, someone who insists there is no God is not in denial as they accept as true that there is no God.
If your viewpoint is there is a God, then the two parties look exactly the same in practice but they are not.
False teaching..
Yeah, you really should explain why.
On what basis?
Come on, you know the answer - On the basis of a different belief system.
Facts vs fiction
Some facts are not provable on this level as like the existence of God. This was one of the taunting constantly thrown at Jesus while living as a mortal.
You have been endowed with a mind and spiritual helpers to discern between "facts vs friction".
Psychologicalsologies
I am specifically asking the accuser. Let's hear from her.
On your answer, each "different belief system" is based on the search for God (Truth). From the barbarian to now the semi barbarian. The divine goal for this planet is to achieve light and life. But the brotherhood of man has to be achieved first.
Even these tech people in trying to create God is really searching for God (our Eternal Father).
Seems to me there's at least one exception - the belief system that insists there is no God. There is no search for God there. By the way, arguing a "divine goal" is illogical for a planet but it also implies knowledge based on belief not on fact unless I missed the Zoom call...
Think born nuclear of the planets nucleus. I was born the Trinity AntiMatter Singularity both in the flesh 3 states as one for everlasting life. No psychologyologies I'm eBe - ⚜️
The denial of God is actually the reverse. One cannot deny something if the thing does not exist in one's mind.
Actually, the creation of life/planet/universe is by divine design/goal. The progression of this planet from a hot mess to suitable for life was by divine design/goal. Fact - creation and evolution exist together. The physical is a direct expression of the divine. God is ever searching for ways to express himself. Creation always originates from God.
You wrote "denial" I wrote there are those who "insists there is no God". There's an important semantic difference. But I'll bow out now because of the futility of arguing for or against a belief system. Fair winds.
What's the difference between denial and "insists there is no God"?
A belief system grounded in faith. This is all we humans have right now as we journey inward in the search of the Creator. The life of Jesus as a human was also to demonstrate the belief in God based entirely on faith.
The difference is basically one of viewpoint. Denial, definitionally, means a refusal to admit the truth or reality of something. It implies that, in our discussion, God is real and some people refuse to accept that. Hence, they are deniers.
On the other hand, someone who insists there is no God is not in denial as they accept as true that there is no God.
If your viewpoint is there is a God, then the two parties look exactly the same in practice but they are not.
By "insisting" that one's truth is the truth, it is equivalent to denying the truth.